Perbandingan Pengujian Kandungan Aspal: Metode Centrifuge vs Reflux

Authors

  • Insira insani Fitri Akademi Teknik Adikarya, Jambi, Indonesia
  • Delfi Kurnia Zebua Akademi Teknik Adikarya, Jambi, Indonesia
  • Ollga Febiola Akademi Teknik Adikarya, Jambi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53863/kst.v7i01.1502

Keywords:

Highway, Construction, Technology

Abstract

This study aims to compare asphalt content testing results using the centrifuge method and the Reflux method on Asphalt Concrete-Binder Course (AC-BC) mixtures. The research was conducted experimentally using samples collected from an Asphalt Mixing Plant (AMP) in Kerinci Regency. The results show that the Reflux method produced an average asphalt content of 6.059%, which is more accurate and closer to the actual asphalt content compared to the centrifuge method with an average of 5.986%. The differences are attributed to the precision level of the equipment and the testing processes. Although the centrifuge method is faster, its results are less consistent compared to the Reflux method. Factors such as human error and equipment conditions also influenced the test outcomes. The Reflux method is recommended for tests requiring high accuracy, despite its longer testing duration and higher potential risks. This study is expected to serve as a reference for quality control of asphalt mixtures in laboratories and fieldwork

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). (2013). Guide for Quality Control and Assurance of Concrete Mixtures. American Concrete Institute.

Asphalt Institute. (2014). MS-2 Asphalt Mix Design Methods. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute.

ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). (2018). ASTM D2172: Standard Test Methods for Quantitative Extraction of Bitumen from Bituminous Paving Mixtures. ASTM International.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (1994). SNI 03-3640-1994: Metode Pengujian Kadar Aspal dengan Ekstraksi. Jakarta: BSN.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2002). SNI 03-6894-2002: Metode Pengujian Ekstraksi Campuran Beraspal dengan Centrifuge. Jakarta: BSN.

Litman, T. (2019). Evaluating Transportation System Efficiency and Equity. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.

Roberts, F. L., Kandhal, P. S., Brown, E. R., Lee, D. Y., & Kennedy, T. W. (1996). Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design, and Construction. National Asphalt Pavement Association.

Shell Bitumen Handbook. (2015). Shell Bitumen Handbook (6th ed.). Shell Global Solutions.

White, G. (2020). Advances in Asphalt Pavement Technology: Design and Testing Methods. Springer.

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Fitri, I. insani, Zebua, D. K., & Febiola, O. (2025). Perbandingan Pengujian Kandungan Aspal: Metode Centrifuge vs Reflux. JURNAL KRIDATAMA SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI, 7(01), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.53863/kst.v7i01.1502

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.