A Semiotic Analysis on Signs Used on Tingkuluak Traditional Clothes of Koto Gadang

Authors

  • Putri Annisa Zulhantiar Universitas Sumatera Utara, North Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Mutiara Universitas Sumatera Utara, North Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Nidiya Mawarni Universitas Sumatera Utara, North Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Alemina Br. Perangin-Angin Universitas Sumatera Utara, North Sumatera, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53863/e-jou.v5i02.1584

Abstract

This study conducts a semiotic analysis of the signs embedded in Tingkuluak Koto Gadang, a traditional headpiece worn by Minangkabau women in Indonesia. Employing Charles Sanders Peirce's triadic model of semiotics, the research examines how motifs, colors, and ornaments function as signs to convey cultural meanings. The qualitative case study approach involved direct observation, visual documentation, and interviews with cultural experts to identify and interpret the semiotic elements in Tingkuluak Koto Gadang. The analysis revealed ten signs categorized into six types: Sinsign, Legisign, Icon, Index, Symbol, and Decisign. Among these, Icon and Decisign were the most dominant, with three occurrences each. For instance, the color red and gold serve as Icons, symbolizing courage and prosperity, while floral motifs like Bunga and Akar Daun function as Decisigns, representing harmony and resilience. Other signs, such as the Padi motif (Symbol) and Rumbai Kotak (Index), reflect agricultural heritage and structured societal values, respectively. The findings underscore that Tingkuluak Koto Gadang is not merely decorative but a rich semiotic system encoding Minangkabau identity, social norms, and philosophical values. However, the study highlights a growing disconnect among younger generations, who increasingly perceive these garments as aesthetic rather than symbolic. This research contributes to cultural preservation by decoding the hidden meanings of traditional attire, emphasizing the need for educational initiatives to sustain this intangible heritage. It also demonstrates the efficacy of Peirce’s semiotic framework in analyzing non-verbal cultural texts, offering a model for future studies on traditional clothing and material culture

References

Aiello, G. (2020). Visual Semiotics: Key Concepts and New Directions. In L. Pauwels & D. Mannay, The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods (pp. 367–380). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526417015.n23

Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The Basics (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203014936

De Saussure, F. (2009). Course in General Linguistic. Open Court. https://lib.unikom.ac.id/opac/detail/0-20828/Course%20In%20General%20Linguistic

Eco, U. (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2

Elkins, J. (Ed.). (2009). Visual Literacy (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203939574

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. HUMANIKA, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill.

Hu, B., Zelenko, O., Pinxit, V., & Buys, L. (2019). A Social Semiotic Approach and a Visual Analysis Approach for Chinese Traditional Visual Language: A Case of Tea Packaging Design. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(2), 168. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0902.06

Kerusauskaite, S. (2023). Role of Culture in Meaning Making: Bridging Semiotic Cultural Psychology and Active Inference. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 57(2), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09744-x

Mhonyani, S. (2018). Symbolic meaning of Naga traditional clothing. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1).

Na’am, M. F., Wahyuningsih, S. E., Setyowati, E., Prasetyaningtyas, W., Kamis, A., & Susanto, M. R. (2019). Riau Malay Traditional Clothes: Functional, Symbolic, Aesthetic, and Cluster State Studies. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(1c2).

Noth, W. (1990). Handbook of Semiotics. Indiana University Press.

Peirce, C. S. (1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 1-6, C. Hartshorne, & P. Weiss (Eds.), Vols. 7-8, A.W. Burks (Ed.). MA: Harvard University Press.

Pratami, N., Devi Santika, & Verayanti Utami. (2022). Semiotic Analysis in Downy Collection Advertisement. ELYSIAN JOURNAL : English Literature, Linguistics and Translation Studies, 2(2), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.36733/elysian.v2i2.3580

Ramadhani, R., Yuliawati, S., & Suganda, D. (2019). Semiotic Analysis of the Myth of Eroticism in English Song Lyrics. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 4(4), 976–982. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.445

Suniarini, K., Sukarini, N. W., & Budiasa, I. G. (2017). Semiotic study on colour terms in “Aquamarine” Film. Journal Humas, 18(2), 386–395.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-23

How to Cite

Zulhantiar, P. A., Zein, M., Mawarni, N., & Angin, A. B. P. (2025). A Semiotic Analysis on Signs Used on Tingkuluak Traditional Clothes of Koto Gadang. English Education and Literature Journal, 5(02), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.53863/e-jou.v5i02.1584