The Use of Choose-Read-Share and Reading Logs as Extensive Reading Strategies to Foster Students' Reading Habits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53863/e-jou.v5i02.1546Keywords:
Extensive Reading, Choose-Read-Share, Reading Logs, Student Motivation, EFL LearningAbstract
Extensive Reading (ER) is a proven approach to enhancing students' reading fluency, comprehension, and motivation. However, many EFL learners struggle with low reading motivation and technology distraction. This study explores the implementation of the Choose-Read-Share (CRS) strategy and Reading Logs to promote extensive reading. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis (reading logs). The participants were 17 first-year students of the English Language Education Study Program at Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang. Thematic analysis was applied to examine their implementation, benefits, and challenges. Findings indicate that CRS and reading logs increased student autonomy and engagement but posed challenges in maintaining motivation and confidence during discussions. While students enjoyed selecting books, some struggled with choosing appropriate materials. The Share stage supported comprehension but caused anxiety for hesitant students. Reading logs were useful for tracking progress but were sometimes seen as burdensome, leading to incomplete entries. Frequent readers showed better comprehension and engagement, supporting Krashen’s Input Hypothesis and the Matthew Effect (Stanovich, 1986). The study concludes that CRS and reading logs are effective but require modifications. Structured peer discussions, flexible reading log formats, and guided book selection are recommended to improve engagement and reduce sharing anxiety.
References
Bamford, J., & Day, R. R. (2002). Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(2), 136–141.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193
Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (2002). Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(2), 136–141. https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2002/day/day.html
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Gambrell, L. B., & Marinak, B. A. (2009). Simple practices to nurture the motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 63(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.2.5
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833743
Huang, H. T. D. (2015). Exploring the effectiveness of extensive reading on EFL learners' reading motivation and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.123
Huang, Q. (2015). Study on correlation of reading strategies and reading accomplishments of high school students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(6), 1337–1344. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0606.25
Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research (2nd ed.). Libraries Unlimited.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119003618
Nakanishi, T. (2015). A meta-analysis of extensive reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 6–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.157
Nation, I. S. P. (2015). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Nation, P. (2015). Principles guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.12543404
Nurhadi, K., & Larasaty, G. (2018). The low motivated factors in extensive reading achievement. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 1(3), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.33603/rill.v1i3.1433
Park, J. (2016). The effects of extensive reading on reading comprehension, reading rate, and vocabulary acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.130
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. Norton.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wahyudi, A. H., Rayhan, M. Z., Sembiring, G. S. B., Syam, B. N., & Hutagalung, E. V. (2024). The low interest of Indonesian people to read books. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(10), 123–135.
Wiranatha, P. A., & Santosa, M. H. (2024). Systematic literature review on students' reading habits in Indonesia in the era of technology. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30870/gpi.v5i1.26677
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fela Dafitri, Putri Kamalia Hakim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal
