Publication Ethic

Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan is a peer-reviewed electronic journal. To that extent, it clarifies the ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the article publication of Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan including the authors, the chief editors, the Editorial Boards, the peer-reviewers­­­­­ and the publishers (Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen).

Publication ethics is important and must be adhered to by publishing institutions, the principles of honesty, neutrality, justice need to be upheld to produce quality publications, therefore Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan Journal in establishing publication ethics refers to the Regulation of the Head of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications, which essentially upholds three ethical values in publications, namely: Fair play, Confidentiality, Disclosure and conflicts of interest and  Our Publication Ethics is based on the Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors of the Committee on Publication Ethics – COPE (available at http://publicationethics.org/).

Authors must be aware that the Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan is an open-access journal. The journal publishes two issues a year (in January and July, with the scheme "Publish us you go/ In Press"). All articles are available to readers for free without a subscription. All content is available online, including previous publications and articles.

The Editorial Board is responsible, among others, for deciding which of the research papers/articles submitted to the journal should be published and for preventing publication malpractice. Unethical behavior is unacceptable, and the Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan does not tolerate plagiarism in any form.

1. Editors' Responsibilities

Publication Decisions: Editors should be accountable for everything published in their journals and must strive to meet the needs of readers and authors. Editors’decisions to accept or reject a paper for publication should be based on the editorial board’s reviews and the paper’s importance.

Review of Manuscripts: The editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor, who may make use of appropriate means to examine the originality of the contents of the manuscript and ensure the quality of the material they publish, recognizing that journals and sections within journals will have different aims and standards.

Fair Review: Editors should strive to ensure that peer review at their journal is fair, unbiased and timely.The editor ensures that each manuscript received is evaluated on its intellectual content without regard to authors’ sex, gender, race, religion, citizenship, etc.

Confidentiality: The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.The editor must ensure that information regarding manuscripts submitted by the authors is kept confidential.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Editors should require reviewers to disclose any potential competing interests before agreeing to review a submission

2. Author’s Responsibilities

Reporting Standards: Authors should precisely present their original research, as well as objectively discuss its significance. Manuscripts are to be edited in accordance to the author guidelines.

Originality: Authors must certify that their work is entirely unique and original.

Redundancy: Authors should not concurrently submit papers describing essentially the same research. Submitting the same paper to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources: Author(s) should acknowledge all sources of data used in the research and cite publications that have influenced their research.

Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be limited only to those who have made a significant contribution to conceiving, designing, executing, and/or interpreting the submitted study. All those who have made significant contributions to the study should be listed as co-authors. The corresponding author should also ensure that all the authors and co-authors have seen and approved the final submitted version of the manuscript and their inclusion as co-authors.

Data Access and Retention: Authors should retain the raw data related to their submitted paper and must provide it for editorial review upon the editor's request.

Fundamental errors in published works: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her submitted manuscript, the author must immediately notify the editor.

3. Reviewers' Responsibilities

Confidentiality: Manuscript reviewers, the editor, and the editorial staff must not disclose any information regarding submitted manuscripts. All submitted manuscripts are to be treated as privileged information. Editors should provide guidance to reviewers on everything that is expected of them, including the need to handle submitted material in confidence.

Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Standards of Objectivity: Review of submitted manuscripts will be conducted objectively. The reviewers shall express their views clearly, with supporting arguments. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate.

Promptness: If a reviewer believes it is not possible for him/her to review the research reported in a manuscript within the designated guidelines or within the stipulated time, he/she should notify the editor so that an accurate and timely review can be ensured.

Conflict of Interest: All reviewers should have no conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors, and/or the funding bodies.

4. Change or Modification of Published Paper

Withdrawal: Papers published will be withdrawn if the author(s) notice significant errors. Before accepting a withdrawal request, the editorial board and Editor-in-Chief should talk with the author(s) sufficiently. If the paper is agreed to be withdrawn, the following will be implemented:

• The paper in the journal database will be removed.
• The link in the online publication site will be removed.
• Next phrase or similar phrase stating the reason will be shown below the paper title in the Table of Contents and journal volume page: (This paper was withdrawn because of some technical errors).

Replacement: Papers published can be replaced if the author(s) send an updated paper. Before accepting a replacement request, the editorial board and the Editor-in-Chief should speak with the author(s) sufficiently, and at least the reviewers should review the advances. If the paper is agreed to be replaced, the following will be implemented:

• The paper in the journal database will be replaced.
• The link in the online publication site will be replaced.
• Next phrase or similar phrase stating the reason will be shown below the paper title in the Table of Contents and journal volume page: (This paper was replaced because the author(s) sent an updated version. Contact the editor if you want to check the old version.)
• Old versions should be kept separately, and if someone wants to check the old version, the editor can send the PDF to him/her.
• Note that the replacement is acceptable only one time, and only for technical advances.

Removal: Papers published will be removed if reviewers, readers, librarians, publishers, or other subjects notice significant errors or plagiarism. Before removing a paper, the editorial board and Editor-in-Chief should speak with the authors sufficiently and allow enough time for the authors’ explanation. If the paper is agreed to be removed, the following will be implemented:

• The paper in the journal database will be removed.
• The link in the online publication site will be removed.
• Next phrase or similar phrase stating the reason will be shown below the paper title in the Table of Contents and journal volume page: (This paper was removed because of plagiarism).

5. Penalties

Double Submission: If a double submission is found or reported by other sources, the editorial board should check its status. If the double submission was confirmed as an intentional thing,

• Review process will be terminated.
• The reason should be sent to reviewers, the editorial board, and authors.
• All authors’ names will be marked as black list,
• and these authors cannot submit any paper to Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan for five years.

Double Publication: If double publication is found or reported by other sources, the editorial board should check its status. If the double publication was confirmed as an intentional thing,

• This will be reported to the editorial board and author(s).
• This will be sent to the publisher who published the same (or very similar) paper.
• Paper will be removed according to the “Removal” part in Section 4.
• All authors’ names will be marked as black list, and these authors cannot submit any paper to Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan for five years.