Gap Score Analysis Indikator Transportation UI GreenMetric pada Perguruan Tinggi Vokasi: Studi Kasus Politeknik Negeri Medan

Authors

  • Nurkhasanah Rina Puspita Politeknik Negeri Medan, Medan, Indonesia
  • Soraya Muthma Innah Nasution Politeknik Negeri Medan, Medan, Indonesia
  • Veriza Agistin Politeknik Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  • Frans Tomy Syahputra Butarbutar Politeknik Negeri Medan, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53863/kst.v8i01.2339

Keywords:

UI GreenMetric, Sustainable Transportation, Gap Score Analysis, Sustainable Campus, Politeknik Negeri Medan

Abstract

Sustainable transportation is one of the key indicators in the UI GreenMetric ranking system, reflecting a university’s commitment to reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable campus development. This study aims to evaluate the achievement of the Transportation (TR) indicators in the UI GreenMetric at Politeknik Negeri Medan and identify improvement priorities based on the gap level for each indicator. A descriptive quantitative approach with a descriptive-evaluative method was employed. Data were collected through field surveys, observations of transportation facilities, vehicle counts, parking area measurements, and reviews of institutional documents and the UI GreenMetric 2025 assessment instrument. Data were analyzed using Gap Score Analysis, comparing actual scores with the maximum scores established by UI GreenMetric. The results revealed that Politeknik Negeri Medan achieved a Transportation score of 372.5 points, equivalent to 20.69% of the maximum score of 1,800 points. Campus mobility remains highly dependent on motorized vehicles, with a vehicle-to-population ratio of 0.18 and parking areas occupying 9.54% of the total campus area. Furthermore, the campus has not yet provided shuttle services, zero-emission vehicles, or information technology-based transportation systems. The Gap Score Analysis identified TR2 as the indicator with the highest gaps. Therefore, future transportation development should prioritize low-emission transportation modes, private vehicle reduction programs, and smart mobility implementation

References

Amaral, A. R., Rodrigues, E., Gaspar, A. R., & Gomes, Á. (2020). A review of empirical data of sustainability initiatives in university campus operations. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 250). Elsevier Ltd.

Cunha, I., & Cadima, C. (2024). Active travel in the university setting: Assessing the effects of social behavior, socioeconomics, and spatial location. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 17(1), 707–730.

Findler, F., Schönherr, N., Lozano, R., Reider, D., & Martinuzzi, A. (2019). The impacts of higher education institutions on sustainable development: A review and conceptualization. In International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education (Vol. 20, Number 1, pp. 23–38). Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.

Helling, K., & Bölsche, D. S. (2023). Pathways to Sustainable Mobility at Universities - a Case Study at the Environmental Campus Birkenfeld. Journal of Sustainability Perspectives, 415–423.

Hubbiq, A., Hasan, A., Anif, B., Carlo, N., & Fuadi, A.-B. (2024). Strategi Mewujudkan Kampus Hijau Melalui Transportasi Berkelanjutan Menurut UI GreenMetric Di Kampus Politeknik Negeri Medan. Structure Teknik Sipil, 6(1), 1–13.

Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Mifsud, M., Ávila, L. V., Brandli, L. L., Molthan-Hill, P., Pace, P., Azeiteiro, U. M., Vargas, V. R., & Caeiro, S. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals and sustainability teaching at universities: Falling behind or getting ahead of the pack? Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 285–294.

Oestreich, L., Neuenfeldt Júnior, Á., & Ruiz-Padillo, A. (2024). Guidelines to promote sustainable transport in higher education universities: a bibliometric and systematic review. In International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education (Vol. 25, Number 8, pp. 1912–1928). Emerald Publishing.

Qi, H., Li, X., Yin, K., Song, X., & Fang, X. (n.d.). Sustainable development-oriented campus bike-sharing site evaluation model: A case study of Henan Polytechnic University.

Sonetti, G., Barioglio, C., & Campobenedetto, D. (2020). Education for sustainability in practice: A review of current strategies within Italian universities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(13).

Stebeen, R., Coloma, R., Aguilar Miranda, G. J., Luis, J., Llamuca, L., Xavier, C., & Lara, O. (2025). Active Transport And Mobility On University Campuses: A Comprehensive Review Of Interventions And Travel Behaviors. In International Journal of Environmental Sciences (Vol. 11, Number 17).

Sundram, V. P. K., Hashim, N., Shariff, S. H., Pujiati, A., & Ardiansari, A. (2021). Sustainable Transportation on University Campus: A Case at UiTM Selangor, Puncak Alam Campus, Malaysia and Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(2), 262–272.

Suwartha, N., & Berawi, M. A. (2019). The Role Of UI Greenmetric As A Global Sustainable Ranking For Higher Education Institutions. Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia. In International Journal of Technology (Vol. 10, Number 5, pp. 862–865).

Suwartha, N., & Sari, R. F. (2013). Evaluating UI GreenMetric as a tool to support green universities development: Assessment of the year 2011 ranking. Journal of Cleaner Production, 61, 46–53.

UI GreenMetric. (2025). UI GreenMetric Guideline 2025. UI Green Metric World University Ranking.

Velazquez, L., Munguia, N., Platt, A., & Taddei, J. (2006). Sustainable university: what can be the matter? Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 810–819.

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Puspita, N. R., Nasution, S. M. I., Agistin, V., & Butarbutar, F. T. S. (2026). Gap Score Analysis Indikator Transportation UI GreenMetric pada Perguruan Tinggi Vokasi: Studi Kasus Politeknik Negeri Medan. Jurnal Kridatama Sains Dan Teknologi, 8(01), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.53863/kst.v8i01.2339

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.