Metode Peningkatan Literasi pada Pendidikan: Analisis Bibliometrik pada Publikasi 2013 – 2023

Rasyid Zuhdi; Bagiya Bagiya; Suci Ika Febrianti

doi:10.53863/kst.v5i02.1020

Authors

Rasyid Zuhdi Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen, Kebumen, Indonesia
Bagiya Bagiya Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo, Purworejo, Indonesia
Suci Ika Febrianti SMK N 1 Banyumas, Banyumas, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53863/kst.v5i02.1020

Keywords:

methods, literacy, education

Abstract

This study aims to determine the conditions in the range of 2013-2023 related to the scientific map, publication trends, and thematic research coverage of literacy learning methods in education, especially articles published in Scopus, Google Schoolar, and Crossref indexed journals. The research process focused on the following questions: (1). How are literacy improvement methods in education seen from the publication map; (2). What is of interest to academics regarding literacy improvement methods in education? and (3). What topics are often written about in publications related to methods of improving literacy in education? In addition to the research and data sources to be used in the bibliometric analysis, 1200 articles were found through the keywords "literacy, education" in the "article title &; abstract" published in Scopus, Google Schoolar and Crossref indexed journals. To explore and identify the main thematic areas and topics that appear in the publications using keyword occurrence analysis. To support the data analysis and visualization process obtained from Harzing's Publish or Perish and VOSviewer applications. The results of this study show that the method of improving literacy in education is a research trend that has been in great demand in the last 10 years and is still growing. In the visualization section, the high keyword density is presented in 8 clusters, namely: (1) literacy; (2) student; (3) study; (4) ability; and (5) technique. Bibliometric analysis in the form of mapping provides information about the development pattern of publications in the field of literacy in education. These findings provide contributions for future research: 1) The need for holistic research on improving literacy in education; and, 2) the need for in-depth research that focuses on one or several themes that are still rarely studied such as: (1) literacy culture; (2) early age; (3) student response; (4) literacy numeracy; (5) scientific literacy skills; (6) literacy tree; (7) culture and (8) habituation.

Keywords: methods, literacy, education

References

Cho, J. (2017). A comparative study of the impact of Korean research articles in four academic fields using altmetrics. 18(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-02-2016-0005

Dimitra, K., Nikolaos, M., & Maro, V. (2017). Bibliometrics and Altmetrics literature review: Performance indicators and comparison analysis. 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-08-2016-0036

Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey?: VOSviewer , a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Eck, N. J. Van, & Waltman, L. (2018). VOSviewer Manual. Universiteit Leiden.

Ibrahim, C. (2019). TREN KEPENULISAN PUBLIKASI PENELITIAN INDONESIA TEINDEKS PADA JURNAL SCOPUS. 6003, 13–28.

Kharizmi, M. (2015). KESULITAN SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI. Jupendas: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 2(2), 11–21.

Kim, S., Chung, E., & Lee, J. Y. (2018). Latest trends in innovative global scholarly journal publication and distribution platforms. 5(2), 100–112.

Kolahi, J., & Khazaei, S. (2016). Altmetric?: Top 50 dental articles in 2014. Nature Publishing Group, 220(11), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.411

Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2012). Interactive overlays?: A new method for generating global journal maps from Web-of-Science data. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.11.003

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2015). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Padmadewi, N. ., & Artini, L. . (2018). Literasi di Sekolah. Nilacakra.

Padrós-Cuxart, R., Riera-Quintero, C., & March-Mir, F. (2016). Bibliometrics?: a Publication Analysis Tool. 1567, 44–53.

Pradana, B. H., Nurul, F., & Rochana, T. (2017). Pelaksanaan gerakan literasi sekolah sebagai upaya membentuk habitus literasi siswa di sma negeri 4 magelang. Jurnal Solidarity, 6(2), 12–25.

Rohanda, & Winoto, Y. (2018). Analisis Bibliometrika Tingkat Kolaborasi, Produktivitas Penulis, Serta Profil Artikel Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan Tahun 2014-2018. 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18326/ pustabiblia.v3i1.1-16

Rohman, A. (2022). Literasi dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis di Era Disrupsi. EUNOIA (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia), 2(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.30821/eunoia.v2i1.1318

Rosdiana, L. ., Sunendar, D., & Damaianti, V. . (2021). Tingkat Literasi Membaca Anak Selama Pembelajar Daring Saat Pandemi Covid-19. 2(10), 161. https://doi.org/10.35194/alinea.v10i2.1420

Thomas, E. (2008). The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in UK higher education institutions. Universities UK.

Waltman, L., & Noyons, E. (2018). Bibliometrics for Research Management and Research Evaluation (p. 24). Leiden University.