Simbolisme Anatomi Pohon dalam Al-Qur’an: Analisis Ekolinguistik dan Metafora Konseptual

Authors

  • Mustakim Saleh Universitas Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia
  • Aliurridha Aliurridha Universitas Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia
  • Jamaluddin Gesrianto A'ban Akademi Komunitas Industri Manufaktur Bantaeng, Bantaeng, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53863/jrk.v6i01.2264

Keywords:

Tree Symbolism, Ecolinguistics, Conceptual Metaphor, Qur’an, Morality

Abstract

This study examines tree symbolism in QS Ibrahim, verses 24 and 26, by integrating ecolinguistic and conceptual metaphor approaches. It aims to reveal how the Qur’an employs tree metaphors to represent human morality and the resilience of faith. A descriptive-analytical qualitative method was used, involving observation and note-taking of the Qur’anic text, followed by mapping the concrete domain (tree anatomy) onto the abstract domain (moral concepts), and analysis using the Bang and Døør framework. Findings indicate that a good tree with strong roots, a sturdy trunk, and upward-reaching branches symbolizes a good statement, a foundation of faith, consistency of character, and growth of deeds. Conversely, a bad tree with uprooted roots and fragile structure represents a bad statement, moral instability, and a lack of foundational values. The conceptual model highlights the binary opposition of good and bad trees and underscores the role of human ecological experience in systematically understanding morality. These findings advance ecolinguistic and conceptual metaphor studies in Qur’anic linguistic research.

References

Bang, J. C., & Door, J. (1993). Eco-Linguistics: A Framework. In Aila.

Cresswel, J. W. (2014). Research design:Qualitative, quantitative and moxed method. In Sage Publications Inc.

Djamjuri, D. S., Zuriyati, Z., & Attas, S. G. (2022). Metaphor in Parable from the Noble Qur’an: A Corpus Based Stylistic Approach. Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an, 18(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.21009/JSQ.018.1.03

Do Couto, H. H. (2014). Ecological approaches in linguistics: A historical overview. Language Sciences, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.001

Jannah, M. (2025). Syajarah Țayyibahsebagai Nilai Karakter Qur’ani: Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes terhadap Q.S Ibrahim: 24-25. Qur’anic Interpretation Journal, 2(2), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.25217/qij.v2i2.7081

Jannah, T., & Syayfi, S. (2024). Kajian Amtsal Al-Qur’an(Analisis Perumpamaan Pohon Sebagai Kalimah ThayyibahDalam Qs. Ibrahim: 24-27). Izzatuna, Jurnal Ilmu Al-Quran Dan Tafsir, 5(1), 26–40. https://jurnal.stiuwm.ac.id/izzatuna/article/view/77/48

Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: a practical introduction. Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, G. (2014). Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Speech and Language, 8, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958

Lakoff, G., & Johnsen, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. The university of Chicago press.

Maulana, I. P. A. P., & Putra, I. B. G. D. (2021). METAFORA KONSEPTUAL KASTA DALAM MASYARAKAT BALI: KAJIAN LINGUISTIK KOGNITIF. PRASI: Jurnal Bahasa, Seni, Dan Pengajarannya, 16(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.23887/prasi.v16i02.37578

Saleh, M., Aliurridha, & A’ban, J. G. (2025). Anatomi Pohon sebagai Konstruksi Analogi dalam Al-Qur’an: Perspektif Ekolinguistik. Indonesian Research Journal on Education, 5(6), 225–230. https://irje.org/irje/article/view/3502

Shihab, M. Q. (2008). Membumikan Al-Qur’an: Fungsi dan Peran Wahyu dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat. Mizan.

Stibbe, A. (2020). Ecolinguistics. In Ecolinguistics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855512

Published

2026-06-03

How to Cite

Saleh, M., Aliurridha, A., & A'ban, J. G. (2026). Simbolisme Anatomi Pohon dalam Al-Qur’an: Analisis Ekolinguistik dan Metafora Konseptual. Ruang Kata, 6(01), 277–285. https://doi.org/10.53863/jrk.v6i01.2264

Issue

Section

Articles