Transitivity in English Textbook: A Discourse Analysis of “Pathway to English Text Book” for SMA/MA Grade X

Authors

  • Widya Mas Mardavam Jayanti Universitas Tidar, Magelang, Indonesia
  • Farikah Farikah Universitas Tidar, Magelang, Indonesia
  • Afi Normawati Universitas Tidar, Magelang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53863/jrk.v5i01.1670

Keywords:

transitivity, discourse analysis, textbook

Abstract

Language plays a central role in the teaching process because they connect, complement knowledge, and shape learners’ worldviews. When learning a language, textbooks play a very important role in conveying language input as well as shaping leaners’ knowledge of language structure and social roles. In Indonesia, English textbooks are expected to meet the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) standards to supports communicative competence across educational level s. However, recent studies show that many high school English textbooks fail to meet the expected ECFR B1 level. Addressing this issue this study investigates how transitivity processes and participants are represented in the reading sections of Pathway to English textbook for SMA/MA Grade X with the aim of discovering how language structures facilitate students’ linguistics and cognitive development. Using descriptive qualitative method and discourse analysis grounded in Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics theorized by Gerot and Wignell, the study analyzes 297 clauses from selected texts. It determines the process types of transitivity and explores participant roles in each process. The results reveal dominance of material processes (51.85%), which implies focus on physical activity and concrete events, followed by elational (29.97%), mental (7.74%), verbal (6.06%), existential (3.03%), and behavioral (1.35%) processes, none of the meteorological processes. Participant roles such as actors and goals mainly took place in material processes, while sensors and phenomena were common in mental processes. This distribution shows that although the textbook offers diversity in types of transitivity, it may fall short in offering balance to ensure diversified linguistic exposure. These findings offer suggestions for textbook developers and teachers to strengthen the expression of the process of transitivity, thus improving English instruction and enriching students’ linguistic and critical thinking skills in EFL context. 

References

Alamsari, F. (2018). Physiological And Psychological Verbs In Behavioral Process: A Systemic Functional Grammar Approach. Barista: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa Dan Pariwisata, 5(1), 36–48.

Bachore, M. M. (2022). Analysis of Gender Representation in English Language Learning Materials: The Case of Grade Ten Textbook in Ethiopia. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(5), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n5p175

Emilia, E., Moecharam, N. Y., & Syifa, I. L. (2017). Gender in EFL classroom: Transitivity analysis in English textbook for Indonesian students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 206–214. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6877

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar (B. N. Khajati (ed.)). Gerd Stabler. https://dosen.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2021/03/making-sense-of-functional-grammar1.pdf

Halliday, M. A. . (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (Third). Oxford University Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394207305.ch1

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. In English. Longman, London. http://www.mfi.uni-miskolc.hu/toltessy/DA-3-WhatCohesion.doc

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Introduction To Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.

Hikmah, D. (2019). Media For Language Teaching and Learning in Digital Era. International Journal of English Education and Linguistics (IJoEEL), 1(2), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.33650/ijoeel.v1i2.963

Ismail, D. (2020). Participants of Material Processes in Grammatical Metaphors Involving the Verbs Make and Take. Indonesian EFL Journal, 6(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v6i1.2638

Kuntarto, E. (2017). Telaah Linguistik untuk Guru Bahasa. In Universitas Jambi. https://repository.unja.ac.id/5908/1/BUKU TELAAH LINGUISTIK.pdf

Lastari, N. K. H. (2023). Transitivity Analysis of Indonesian Online-News Headlines on Education Issue: Full Day School. JOSELT (Journal on Studies in English Language Teaching), 4(1).

Lumepa, R. A., Tuna, J. R., & Andries, F. A. (2022). Readability Assessment of Reading Texts in Pathway to English for SMA/MA Grade X. Kompetensi: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Dan Seni, 1(04), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.53682/kompetensi.v1i04.1856

Ngongo, M., Maromon, E., Loba, D., & Herman. (2022). A Systemic Functional Linguistics Analysis of Text Transitivity of Mathew Gospel, New Testament of Kupang Malay. World Journal of English Language, 12(5), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n5p188

Nurfadilah, L., Samsi, Y. S., & Al-Baekani, A. K. (2022). The Study of Systemic Functional Linguistic (SFL) on EFL students’ Writing in Making Caption. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 2022(19), 497–508. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7222833

Nurhadi Maya, A., Eliza, & Safitri, L. (2020). Analysis of Transitivity in Reading Text for Second Grade Students’ of Senior High School. ELLTER Journal, 1(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.22236/ellter.v1i2.5449

Nuristiana, P. (2018). Participant Roles and Process Types in English Health Insurance Forms. ELT Echo : The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 3(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.24235/eltecho.v3i2.3310

Nurwanti, N. (2022). a Transitivity Analysis on the Third Semester English Education Department Students’ Descriptive Writing. SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan, 1(2), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i2.11

Poedjiastutie, D., Akhyar, F., Hidayati, D., & Nurul Gasmi, F. (2018). Does Curriculum Help Students to Develop Their English Competence? A Case in Indonesia. Arab World English Journal, 9(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no2.12

Sihura, M. (2019). Transitivity Process in Frozen Movie: A Study of Systemic Functional Grammar. International Journal of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 2(2), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.55637/ijsfl.2.2.1480.79-85

Wicaksono, L. (2016). Bahasa Dalam Komunikasi Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pembelajaran Prospektif, 1(2), 9–19. http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/lp3m%0Ahttp://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/lp3m/article/download/19211/16053

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Jayanti, W. M. M., Farikah, F., & Normawati, A. (2025). Transitivity in English Textbook: A Discourse Analysis of “Pathway to English Text Book” for SMA/MA Grade X. Ruang Kata, 5(01), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.53863/jrk.v5i01.1670

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories