Campur Kode Tuturan Guru Bahasa Indonesia dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar: Studi di SMP Darul Hikam

Authors

  • Akbar Prayogi Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen, Indonesia
  • Lutfi Fatchurrohman Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen, Indonesia
  • Syahrul Romadhon Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen, Indonesia
  • Prissila Prahesta Waningyun Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen, Indonesia
  • Muh Akbar Kurniawan Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen, Indonesia
  • Muchlas Abror Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53863/jrk.v5i01.1532

Keywords:

mixed code, teacher's speech, Darul Hikam Junior High School

Abstract

The phenomenon of code mixing in the speech of Indonesian teachers during the learning process in the classroom is an interesting topic to study, especially in a bilingual or multilingual environment. This study aims to analyze the mixed forms of code used by teachers, identify the factors that affect their use, and evaluate their impact on student comprehension. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data was collected through direct observation in the classroom as well as interviews with teachers and students. The results of the study show that the code mix that appears in learning includes three main types, namely mixing code in, mixing code outward, and mixing mixed code. Factors that encourage the use of mixed codes include the limitations of word equivalents in Indonesian, language habits in daily interactions, and pedagogical strategies to facilitate the understanding of teaching materials. Although mixing codes can be an effective tool in explaining certain concepts, their excessive use has the potential to hinder good and correct mastery of the Indonesian language. Therefore, a prudent pedagogical policy is needed in utilizing code mixing to support the effectiveness of learning without reducing students' language competence in formal Indonesian

References

Chaer, Abdul, dan Agustina, Leonie. 2004. Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Holmes, Janet. 2013. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York: Routledge.

Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 2008. Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Mahsun. 2014. Sosiolinguistik: Metode dan Kajian Awal. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nursaid, & Marjusman Maksan. 2002. Sosiolinguistik (Buku Ajar). Padang: FBSS UNP Press.

Romaine, Suzanne. 1995. Bilingualism. Oxford: Blackwell.

Srihartatik, A., & Mulyani, S. 2017. Alih Kode dan Campur Kode Guru dengan Murid di Sekolah.

Suwito. 1983. Pengantar Awal Sosiolinguistik Teori dan Problema. Surakarta: Fakultas Sastra USM.

Sumarsono. 2022. Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: SABDA (Lembaga Studi Agama, Budaya, dan Perdamaian).

Sutrisno, Hadi. 2005. Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Wardhaugh, Ronald. 2006. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (5th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

Weinreich, Uriel. 1974. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. The Hague: Mouton.

Yule, George. 2010. The Study of Language (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Published

2025-03-04

How to Cite

Prayogi, A., Fatchurrohman, L., Romadhon, S., Waningyun, P. P., Kurniawan, M. A., & Abror, M. (2025). Campur Kode Tuturan Guru Bahasa Indonesia dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar: Studi di SMP Darul Hikam. RUANG KATA: Journal of Language and Literature Studies , 5(01), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.53863/jrk.v5i01.1532