The Role of AI in Developing Academic Writing Competence: A Cross-Institutional Analysis of Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53863/e-jou.v6i01.1957Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Academic Writing, AI literacy, Higher Education, Mixed-MethodsAbstract
This study investigates the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in developing academic writing competence among English education students in higher education. Employing a comparative mixed-methods design, the research involved first-semester students from UIN Bukittinggi and Universitas Rokania during the 2025–2026 academic year. Data were collected through pre- and post-writing tests, a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)-based survey, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative findings reveal significant improvements in students’ academic writing performance in both institutions, with an average score increase of 12.2 points at UIN Bukittinggi and 7.9 points at Universitas Rokania. Improvements were evident in grammatical accuracy, argumentative coherence, and citation accuracy. Qualitative results indicate that students who received structured AI literacy training engaged more critically with AI feedback, while students without institutional guidance tended to rely passively on AI output. The findings demonstrate that AI-assisted writing is most effective when supported by institutional policies, pedagogical scaffolding, and ethical guidance. This study contributes to the growing discourse on responsible AI integration in academic writing instruction in higher education
References
Adams, C., Chuah, K. M., & Sumintono, B. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: Opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4125–4145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11237-0
Agustina, K. P., & Widyaningsih, T. L. (2023). The impact of outlining technique on seventh grade students’ writing. English Education and Literature Journal (E-Jou), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.53863/e-jou.v6i01.1816
Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2022). EFL students’ perceptions of automated writing evaluation tools in academic writing. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 245–260.
Bai, L., Hu, G., & Gu, Y. (2021). Scaffolding EFL students’ academic writing through technology-enhanced feedback. System, 97, 102432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102432
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burstein, J., Chodorow, M., & Leacock, C. (2019). Automated essay evaluation: The criterion online writing service. AI Magazine, 40(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v40i1.2867
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., & Williams, M. D. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges, and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2021). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (4th ed.). Routledge.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
Hyland, K. (2022). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELc Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Li, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Automated writing evaluation: Perceptions and impacts on EFL learners’ writing. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 44–61.
Marzuki, K., Mustapha, R., & Prasojo, L. D. (2023). The impact of AI-powered writing tools on Indonesian EFL learners’ writing quality. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2195678. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2195678
O’Neill, M. (2020). Automated writing evaluation and academic integrity: Balancing innovation and ethics. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09362-4
Pecorari, D. (2015). Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis. Bloomsbury.
Ranalli, J. (2021). Giving automated feedback a human face: Students’ engagement with AWE feedback. CALICO Journal, 38(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.40155
Schroeder, S., & Adesope, O. O. (2019). A systematic review of technology-supported writing instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 799–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09471-3
Tseng, W. T., & Yeh, H. C. (2019). Learners’ engagement with automated feedback in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527360
Wardhani, B. D. P. K. (2023). AI-resistant assignments in writing class: Insights from Australian higher education websites. English Education and Literature Journal (E-Jou), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.53863/e-jou.v6i01.1934
Wu, Z., & Li, J. (2022). The effects of AI-assisted writing on EFL learners’ writing performance. Computers & Education, 187, 104528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104528
Yang, K., Chen, X., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Modifying AI, enhancing essays: Student engagement with AI feedback in academic writing. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100155
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Khabib Muafi, Vivi Amanda, Yessi Darmayanti, Uchy Mukho Adrianty, Rianto Rianto, Solehatur Rizkiyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal










