A Constructivist-Ecological Model in Utilizing Collaborative Platforms to Improve Academic Writing Skills: A Conceptual Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53863/e-jou.v6i01.1887Keywords:
constructivist, ecological perspective, academic writing, digital collaborative platforms, affordanceAbstract
In language learning, digital platforms have offered unique opportunities to the learners to expand their skills and competencies beyond their standard level. In academic writing, collaborative platforms, or digital collaborative platforms, have been widely used by writers to achieve their writing goals. However, these platforms have been used in random manners and ways, according to different degrees of the writers’ familiarity to the platforms. There is no structured pattern of how these platforms are effectively used and able to support the writers optimally. Therefore, the paper is conceptualizing a proposed model of how the digital collaborative platforms may function as affordances in supporting the academic writers achieving their goals. The affordances technically function as a bridge between the constructivism approach and the ecological perspective. affordances refer to opportunities for action that the environment provides, which learners perceive and utilize. The learners’ ability to use the affordances determine how they construct the meanings and ideas, especially in their writing. The affordances are available within the environment, creating an ecology for the writers, under the ecological perspective lens. A five-stages model is presented in the paper to explore how a writer is supported by the collaborative platforms in each stage to reach their goals. The stages are initial writing task; interaction with affordances; knowledge construction; feedback and reflection; and finally, development of writing proficiency. The elaboration is done within an ecological perspective and the principles of constructivism. Future research would benefit optimally if focusing more on the empirical aspects of the model and how the effectiveness of digital tools in creating affordances in the five-stage-model intervention
References
Ahmad, R., Ahmad, R., Sagir, M. I., & Jaafar, T. J. (2020). Paradigm of shift in assessment: Constructivist and instructional technology model. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(8), 1394–1397.
Azizah, R., Shinta, A., Endang Fauziati, & Koesoemo Ratih. (2024). Connectivism Practice in English Language Teaching (ELT): Teachers’ Perception on Benefits and Challenges. Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research, 2(8), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.62504/jimr810
Badwan, K., & Simpson, J. (2022). Ecological Orientations to Sociolinguistic Scale: Insights from Study Abroad Experiences. Applied Linguistics Review, 9, 356–363.
Barnett, R. (2024). Seven Pains of Writing: The Discomforts of Academic Becoming in a Judgmental Age. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222241305781
Behrend, M. B. (2014). Engeströ m ’ s activity theory as a tool to analyse online resources embedding academic literacies. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(1), 109–120.
Biju, L. G., & Rahman, A. (2023). Review on the impact of technology-supported writing environment for developing writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 23(3), 290–313. https://callej.org/index.php/journal/article/view/60/36
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an Experimental Ecology of Human Development. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.14195/0870-4147-48-1
Chen, X., & Zhang, F. (2022). Construction of College English Ecological Classroom from the Perspective of Student-centered Theory. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 3(1), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v3i1.512
Chong, S. W., Isaacs, T., & McKinley, J. (2023). Ecological systems theory and second language research. Language Teaching, 56(3), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000283
Fakhruddin, A., Astuti, P., Rustipa, K., & Wahyuni, S. (2024). The Influence of Digital Writing Platforms on Collaborative Writing Processes in Undergraduate Students. Proceedings of Fine Arts, Literature, Language, and Education, 110–120.
Fernandes, R., Ananda, A., Montessori, M., Firman, F., Putra, E. V., Naldi, H., & Fitriani, E. (2021). Adaptasi Dosen Digital Immigrant Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Journal of Sociology Research and Education.
Feyzi Behnagh, R., & Yasrebi, S. (2020). An examination of constructivist educational technologies: Key affordances and conditions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 1907–1919. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13036
Fitria, R., Trisnawati, I. K., & Mulyani, M. (2023). What Indonesian EFL Learners Perceive of Collaborative Writing: Experience in Writing Essays Online. English Education Journal, 14(1), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v14i1.29227
Ghufron, M. A., & Nurdianingsih, F. (2020). Flipped teaching with call media in EFL writing course: Indonesian EFL writing teachers’ reflection. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 28(SUPPL.2), 1–18.
Gibson, E. J. (1982). The concept of affordances in development: The renascence of functionalism. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), The concept of development: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 55-81). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hammoodi, S., & Alishah, A. R. (2020). The Evolvement of Autonomous Learning through Social Constructivist Movement. Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 6(1), 91–105.
Howell, E. (2018). Scaffolding multimodality: writing process, collaboration and digital tools. English Teaching, 17(2), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-05-2017-0053
Jasrial, D. Z., & Zaim.M. (2023). Constructivism For English Language Teaching In The 21. Journal of English Education and Linguistics, 7(7).
Jiang, L., Li, Z., & Leung, J. S. C. (2024). Digital multimodal composing as translanguaging assessment in CLIL classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 92(September 2023), 101900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101900
Jin, L. (2018). Digital affordances on WeChat: learning Chinese as a second language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1376687
Jonathans, P. M., & Metboki, Y. (2022). Reflecting on EFL Digital Learning in Indonesia: Seeking for E-Learning Pedagogy. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture (ISoLEC 2021), 612(ISoLEC), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211212.048
Kek, M. Y. C. A., & Huijser, H. (2016). Problem-based learning into the future: Imagining an agile PBL ecology for learning. In Problem-Based Learning into the Future: Imagining an Agile PBL Ecology for Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2454-2
Kesler, A., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Blau, I. (2022). Active Learning by Visual Programming: Pedagogical Perspectives of Instructivist and Constructivist Code Teachers and Their Implications on Actual Teaching Strategies and Students’ Programming Artifacts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(1), 28–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211017793
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383328
Lathifah, A. S. (2024). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Digital dalam Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme: Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan di Era Digital. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan (JURDIKBUD), 4(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurdikbud.v4i1.2838
Limbong, E., Setiawan, I., & Hamilton, A. (2024). Bridging the Gap: The Reality of Digital Technology Integration by Indonesian Pre-service EFL Teachers. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching, 9(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v9i1.1524
Liu, Q., & Chao, C. C. (2018). CALL from an ecological perspective: How a teacher perceives affordance and fosters learner agency in a technology-mediated language classroom. ReCALL, 30(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000222
Mensah, E. (2015). Exploring Constructivist Perspectives in the College Classroom. SAGE Open, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015596208
Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, R. (2023). Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon, 9(6), e16348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348
Miftah, M. Z., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2022). Collaborative Writing Assisted with Edmodo Learning Management System in Indonesian EFL Classes: Learners’ Attitudes and Learning Engagement. Call-Ej, 23(2 Special Issue), 108–131.
Nazari, M., Farnia, M., Ghonsooly, B., & Jafarigohar. (2017). Ecological Understanding of Concept Blockage in Writing Anxiety Based on Bronfenbrenner’ Chronosystem. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies, Vol 05, Iss 03, Pp 174-187 (2017) VO - 05, 03, 174. http://ez.urosario.edu.co/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.bb82346ad8824c8c81003fbd2ae2959b&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=site
Nguyen, Q. N. (2025). Affordance theory in language education: A multidimensional framework. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 29(3). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.29115a1
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Collins, K. M. T., & Frels, R. K. (2013). Foreword: Using Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory to frame quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 7(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2013.7.1.2
Pribadi, B. A., Ichwan, & Purnama, D. A. (2022). Online Learning Based on Constructivism To Support Universitas Terbuka Distant Learners. Jurnal Teknodik, 26, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.vi.978
Schnaider, K. (2023). “The influence of technological designs on teachers’ and students’ meaning-making: Semiotic chains configuring teaching and learning activities”. Computers and Education Open, 4(March), 100136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100136
Shah, R. K. (2019). Effective Constructivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom. International Journal of Education, 7(4), 1–13.
Shirani, R. (2020). Explicit versus implicit corrective feedback during videoconferencing: Effects on the accuracy and fluency of L2 speech. University of Victoria.
Singh, R. (2019). Students’ perspectives on technology integration in ELT. Journal of NELTA, 24(1–2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v24i1-2.27682
Slomp, D. H. (2012). Challenges in assessing the development of writing ability: Theories, constructs and methods. Assessing Writing, 17(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2012.02.001
Subandowo, D., & Sárdi, C. (2023). Academic essay writing in an English medium instruction environment: Indonesian graduate students’ experiences at Hungarian universities. Ampersand, 11(May 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100158
Suhendi, A., Purwarno, P., & Chairani, S. (2021). Constructivism-Based Teaching and Learning in Indonesian Education. KnE Social Sciences, 2021, 76–89. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i4.8668
Szabo, F., & Csepes, I. (2023). Constructivism in Language Pedagogy. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 3(13), 405–417.
Thoms, J. J. (2014). An Ecological View of Whole-Class Discussions in a Second Language Literature Classroom: Teacher Reformulations as Affordances for Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 724–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12119.x
Tungka, N. F. (2018). Guided literacy instruction: Helping students read multimodal English-medium texts. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i2.13281
Van Lier, L. (2010). The ecology of language learning: Practice to theory, theory to practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3(1), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.005
Vorobel, O. (2017). Ecological perspective and foreign language teaching and learning. 14–21.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. J. Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (eds.)). Harvard University Press.
Wardle, E., & Roozen, K. (2012). Addressing the complexity of writing development: Toward an ecological model of assessment. Assessing Writing, 17(2), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2012.01.001
Wuryaningrum, R. (2023). The Role Macrosystems as Main Proponent of the Ecology Approach in Scientific Writing Learning. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(3), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.3.663
Zahn, C. (2017). Digital Design and Learning: Cognitive-Constructivist Perspectives. In S. Schwan & U. Cress (Eds.), The psychology of digital learning: Constructing, exchanging, and acquiring knowledge with digital media (pp. 1–205). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49077-9
Zuo, X., & Ives, D. (2023). Technology-Assisted Reading Instruction for English Language Learners: A Methodological Review. ECNU Review of Education, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231179490
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eric Sulindra, Anastasia Nelladia Cendra, Indriana Lestari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal










