The Perception of Students EFL Class in English Language Learning after Using Voicespice Platform in A Speaking Class

Authors

  • Arif Alexander Bastian Universitas Aisyah Pringsewu, Pringsewu, Lampung, Indonesia
  • Eka Pratiwi Yunianti Universitas Aisyah Pringsewu, Pringsewu, Lampung, Indonesia
  • Erymka Ariyani Universitas Aisyah Pringsewu, Pringsewu, Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53863/e-jou.v5i01.1484

Keywords:

VoiceSpice, Language learning technology, Student feedback, Language learning effectiveness

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of VoiceSpice as a language-learning tool, focusing on its usability, advantages, limitations, and overall impact on students' speaking practice by the students’ perceptions. Moreover, much of the current literature focuses on quantitative measures or general outcomes, leaving a gap in understanding students' personal experiences and challenges with recording technology. Without exploring these individual perspectives, it is difficult to address the barriers that may prevent students from fully leveraging these tools for reflective and autonomous learning. The sample in this study consisted of 15 EFL students who studied English at Universitas Aisyah Pringsewu. Data was collected through observation to get a direct picture of the learning activities carried out, then questionnaires were given to all students and to get more in-depth information, after that doing interview were conducted with 15 students. The survey and feedback results indicate that voice recording has proven to be a useful tool for supporting speaking practice in language learning, with user feedback indicating ease of use, convenience, and support for speaking skill development. The conclusion of VoiceSpice has demonstrated its utility in supporting speaking practice, with users praising its ease of use, convenience, and positive impact on speaking skills. While effective for basic language practice, limitations such as unstable sound quality and the absence of advanced features, including pronunciation checking, were noted. This study suggests that improvements in audio quality and the addition of accuracy-checking features could enhance its effectiveness and usability

References

Aoki, S. (2014). Potential of voice recording tools in language instruction. APPLE Award Winning Papers in TESOL & AL, 14(2), 128–141.

Arora, R., & Stoner, C. (2009). A mixed method approach to understanding brand personality. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18, 272–283.

Cresswell. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publication.

Crystal, D., & House, J. (2017). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Goh, C., & Burns, A. (2020). Teaching Speaking: A Holistic Approach. Cambridge University Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications Incorporated. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975966

Nguyen, N. N. M. (2013). Recording technique: Possible applications in teaching and learning speaking skills for EFL learners. Hue University Journal of Science: Social Sciences and Humanities, 70(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.26459/hujos-ssh.v70i1.3433

Pappas, R., & Keeley, J. (2020). Reducing Anxiety in Language Learning with Technology: Implications for Educators. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1205-1225.

Thompson, M., & Milligan, A. (2021). Developing autonomy and pronunciation with digital recording tools. Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedt.2021.04.004

Zou, B., & Li, J. (2015). Exploring the role of mobile technology in the teaching and learning of English as a foreign language. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 77-88.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-17

How to Cite

Bastian, A. A., Yunianti, E. P., & Ariyani, E. (2025). The Perception of Students EFL Class in English Language Learning after Using Voicespice Platform in A Speaking Class. English Education and Literature Journal (E-Jou), 5(01), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.53863/e-jou.v5i01.1484