Analisis Keselamatan Lalu Lintas Bagi Para Penyeberang Ditinjau Menggunakan Pedestrian Risk Index (PRI) (Studi Kasus Jalan Cik Di Tiro, Yogyakarta)

Authors

  • Hindami Hibatul Haqqi Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama, Kebumen, Indonesia
  • Dyah Widi Astin Intansari Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama, Kebumen, Indonesia
  • Afrie Nardiansyah Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama, Kebumen, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53863/teksling.v3i02.1372

Keywords:

Level of Safety, pendestrian, Pendestrian Risk Index (PRI)

Abstract

Pedestrians are road users who are vulnerable to accidents because the impact is direct on the body and without personal safety equipment, so the fatalities they experience are greater than other road users such as motorbike riders who use helmets and cars that are protected from the impact of accidents. In this research, the Pedestrian Risk Index (PRI) value is used as a calculation to analyze the safety level of road crossings. This research data is in the form of traffic conflict data obtained from observations on Jalan Cik Di Tiro, Sleman, Yogyakarta which were taken on Monday, Wednesday, Saturday and Sunday at 06.00-08.00 to represent the morning, for the afternoon 11.00-14.00 and for afternoon 16.00-18.00. The results of the analysis show that the average PRI value for single crossings is 139.2, while the average PRI value for group crossings is 9.52. These results show that the PRI value individually is much greater than in a group, meaning that it is safer to cross in a group than alone or alone.

References

Abihasan. 2001. Pengembangan Metode Konflik Lalu Lintas Antara Kendaraan dan Pejalan Kaki di Ruas Jalan. Tesis (Tidak Diterbitkan). Jurusan Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Teknik UGM Yogyakarta.

Agam, Oryza. 2019. Analisis Tingkat Keselamatan Penyeberang Menggunakan Pendestrian Risk Index (PRI) (Studi Kasus Pada Siswa Penyeberanga di SMPN 4 Pekanbaru). Tugas Akhir. Program Studi Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Islam Riau Pekanbaru.

Ajzen, Icek. 1988. Attitude, Personality, And Behavior. Great Britain: J.W. Arrowsmith Limited.

Ajzen, Icek. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Process 50, hal. 179 – 211.Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E., 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis Seventh Ed., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Cafiso, S., Garcia Garcia, A., Cavarra ,R., dan Romero Rojas, M.A. 2011. Before and After Study of Crosswalk using a Pedestrian Risk Index.

Malkamah, Siti. 2000. Action Taken By Pedestrian and Driver to Avoid Accident. Forum Teknik Nomor 24 Jilid 3 Tahun 2000, hal 371 -381.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-27

How to Cite

Haqqi, H. H., Intansari, D. W. A., & Nardiansyah, A. (2024). Analisis Keselamatan Lalu Lintas Bagi Para Penyeberang Ditinjau Menggunakan Pedestrian Risk Index (PRI) (Studi Kasus Jalan Cik Di Tiro, Yogyakarta). Jurnal Teknik Sipil Dan Lingkungan, 3(02). https://doi.org/10.53863/teksling.v3i02.1372

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 02 (2024): Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan (Teksling) (in Progress)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Hindami Hibatul Haqqi, Dyah Widi Astin Intansari, Afrie Nardiansyah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.